The Presidential Election Petition Tribunal on Wednesday dismissed the application by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) asking the court to strike out PDP’s petition against President Buhari, because the petitioners failed to join the name of the Vice President Yemi Osinbanjo.
The Peoples Democratic Party and its candidate, Atiku Abubakar, are challenging the victory of President Muhammadu Buhari.
Mr Abubakar is asking the tribunal to declare him winner of the February 23 presidential election.
According to him, the electoral umpire connived with the ruling party to rig the election.
The five-member panel led by Garba Mohammed, who read the lead ruling, said it was not necessary for Mr Osinbajo to join in the petition.
The application had four grounds upon which it was filed.
Among the four grounds are: that the vice president is an indispensable party to the petition and that his fair hearing would be breached should a decision be reached without his input.
That Section 137 (2) of the Electoral Act makes Mr Osinbajo a vital part of the petition.
He added that if the section above is to be followed the petition would be invalidated.
On Wednesday, while addressing the first ground of the application by INEC, the court outlined who the necessary parties to a petition are:
“Subject to the provisions of the constitution, section 137, the Court of Appeal shall have jurisdiction to hear a petition of that nature if it was filed by a necessary party to the petition.
Mr Mohammed said an election petition may be presented by: “the candidate in an election, the political party who participated in an election,” among others.
He noted that an interested petitioner could file a petition on behalf of himself and the other members of the party.
The judge further said that since Mr Buhari is a statutory respondent to the petition, the petition “can efficiently and confidently be adjudicated upon by the court.”
According to the tribunal Chairman, the previous rulings of the Court show that the Vice President is not a necessary party to the petition.
“It is the conclusion in the judgement that running mates to an election is not a necessary party,” he said.
The INEC application challenging the PDP petition for the exclusion of Mr Osinbajo’s name was therefore dismissed by the court.
All the members of the panel agreed to the lead ruling.
Tribunal backs PDP, says Buhari’s academic qualification not ‘pre-election matter’
The Presidential Election Tribunal on Wednesday dismissed the argument by INEC suggesting that the complaints by the PDP against President Muhammadu Buhari’s academic qualification for the 2019 election was a pre-election matter.
The Independent National Electoral Commission said the PDP’s demand should only be regarded as a pre-election matter.
The Peoples Democratic Party’s argument is that President Buhari did not meet the minimum educational requirements for emerging as a candidate for the election.
This is among several issues raised by the petitioners to challenge Mr Buhari’s re-election.
INEC’s application that the petition regarding qualification be struck off was supported by a five-paragraph affidavit.
The head of the tribunal, Mr Mohammed, while addressing the issues ruled that Section 138 (1) (a) of the Electoral Act allows for the filing of petition relating to an allegation of false information.
The tribunal held that it has within its powers to entertain the application and determine the details contained in the petition.
“I am of the view that the contents of section 138 (1)does not fall in the category of a pre-election matter,” he said.
“Although the issue relates to a matter that happened before the election, the issues relate to vital points that cannot be relegated just to a pre-election matter.”
The tribunal dismissed the application, with all other members of the panel not objecting to the lead ruling.
